Maritime Regulatory Pathway Finder
A tool helping users understand the likely regulatory requirements and approach for their vessel and proposed operation.
How It Works
The Maritime Regulatory Pathway Finder guides you through a series of questions about your vessel and planned operations to help identify:
- Applicable regulatory framework
- Relevant authorities and their requirements
- Required certifications and approvals
- Suggested compliance pathway
- Key documentation requirements
This tool is designed to provide general guidance and should not be considered legal advice. Always consult with relevant authorities for definitive requirements.
About This Tool
The Maritime Regulatory Pathway Finder is designed to help developers, operators and technology providers understand which regulatory requirements apply to their maritime autonomous or remotely-operated system in Australian waters.
By stepping through a series of questions about your vessel type, operational profile and intended use, the tool generates a tailored regulatory pathway summarising the key requirements, relevant standards and recommended resources.
Disclaimer
Important: This tool is intended as a guidance resource only. It does not constitute legal or regulatory advice. The output of this tool should not be relied upon as a definitive statement of the regulatory requirements applicable to any specific vessel, operation or system.
Currency of Information: Regulations and guidelines applicable to maritime autonomous systems are evolving rapidly. While the RAS Gateway endeavours to keep this tool up to date, users should verify the current status of any regulatory requirements with the relevant authority (AMSA, CASA, or applicable State/Territory authority).
Key Considerations
Vessel Type
Different vessel types have different regulatory requirements based on size, purpose, and level of autonomy.
Operational Area
Requirements vary based on whether operations are in coastal waters, internal waters, or offshore.
Level of Autonomy
The degree of automation and human oversight affects regulatory approach and evidence requirements.
